| Bray
Yacht Design and Research Ltd. White Rock, B.C. |
|
|
A decision was made to look into various retrofit options
and the choice was narrowed down to a bulbous bow and some form of roll dampening fins.
There has been considerable interest in the advantages of bulbous bows and a large data base
has been established on the West Coast from work done on fish boats and long range
motoryachts. The roll dampening fins were an extra, considered while the boat was out of the
water. In fact, a hydraulically activated system was evaluated but ruled out because of cost
considerations.
The situation was complicated by the fact that Amnesia has
a deep V hull form, twin 1100 h.p. diesels and was designed to cruise at 18 knots and top
out at 22. In her present condition top speed was limited to 18 knots and a quick check of
the fuel flow meter precluded any kind of extended cruising much over 14 knots. This is
still reasonably fast in anything but flat water, but there are 'bragging rights' to
consider. It is 'how fast will she go?' that counts! Not to mention how much (or little)
fuel it takes to achieve that speed.
Bulbous bows are not normally associated with deep V, hard
chine, wide spray-flat, two lift strakes per side kind of boats. Not that the two are
incompatible, however that hull type generally travels at speeds outside the range where a
bulb is effective. Now it is safe to say that work is being done on 'faster' bulbs, but
before all you 'express cruiser' guys step up let me add that speed is relative to the size
of the boat, and in this case was effective because Amnesia is a 75 footer. 'Amnesia' generated considerable interest over the course
of a month while she was being worked on. The general reaction was "Holy Cow, what is
that?" and "Is that some kind of hydrofoil system?". As you see in the
photos, the bulbous bow is 3'-6" in diameter protruding 5'-2" forward from the
stem at the waterline. It looks rather large on first view, however it is carefully
proportioned for maximum effectiveness. The twin keels are 9 ft. long at the root tapering
to 5 ft. at the tip, 3 ft. deep, airfoil shaped, angle 30 degrees from the vertical, and
place as far outboard as possible. This shape and position also adds lift to the stern. They
should have been larger for optimum performance, but the size was limited by the depth of
the vessel and the overall beam. They do not project outside the hull and also match the
center skeg in draft.
Despite having considerable years of experience in 'that
sort of thing' there was still a healthy amount of skepticism around the old boat yard
before the launch. Launch day came and we were invited to attend the sea trials with the
owner's representative on board, for an assessment of our new- fangled appendages. The boat
looked good at her berth sitting level with the boot top showing. It was a typical Vancouver
day; that is, it was raining and blowing, with occasional burst of sunshine just to remind
us how the rest of the world must live. We headed down the muddy Fraser River, where runs
were conducted at various speed with sundry professionals venturing out onto the fore deck
to hang over the bow for short periods of time. We must have looked like a sea-sick crew on
the choppy waters! All looked good over the bow. The owner's rep. was the only one aboard
who had been on the boat previous to the retrofit and the only one who could judge the
difference in performance. First 10 knots, then 12 knots, 14 knots, 16 knots, all looked
really good, so we opened the throttles all the way up. Over 16 knots the bow came way up as
the top of the bulb broke free from the water's surface. Still the bow wave was held below
the height of the spray knocker at all speeds and the bulb was dubbed a success. With the
tidal current running in the river it was impossible to ascertain any real speed advantage
but the general consensus was that the vessel seemed to move more easily. A broadside attack
from a passing tug's wake and some S-turns were the only tests for the keels, which also
appeared to be doing their job effectively. Soaking wet from our adventures on the fore deck
and cold from the wind we headed back after 2 hours of trials, happy with the results.
The next day the owner's rep. delivered Amnesia to her
permanent berth in Vancouver but not before trying her out once more. Now in the broad
expanse of English Bay, without river current running, he opened the throttles up but this
time also adjusted the trim tabs. Why hadn't we thought of that the day before?! The knot
meter rushed up to 16, then 18, and then 20 knots and continued to move up at a slower pace
settling on 21.5 knots. With the trim flatter the bulb remained submerged, rushing ahead of
the boat like a dolphin racing a bow wave.
The twin keels lifted the stern, dampening any rolling motions. The owner is happy with
the improvements, the owner's representative is pleased, and in fact almost skeptical that
the vessel would gain more than it's 1.5 knot calculated speed increase. People along the
waterfront are talking and asking questions about the new, the improved Amnesia. No one
seems to remember the old Symbol 75; you know the one I mean, what was her name?
Patrick J. Bray, |